<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double Column vs Single Column Sidebars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/</link>
	<description>Technology - I Just Eat This Stuff Up!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:11:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bush Mackel</title>
		<link>http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/comment-page-1/#comment-2194</link>
		<dc:creator>Bush Mackel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/#comment-2194</guid>
		<description>@Bobby - ... I&#039;m not gonna lie. That made me REALLY want a milkshake. (#):)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bobby &#8211; &#8230; I&#8217;m not gonna lie. That made me REALLY want a milkshake. (#):)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Revell</title>
		<link>http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/comment-page-1/#comment-2193</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Revell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/#comment-2193</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking about doing away with all sidebars in favor of a chunky, triple thickened, ultra cool footer bar...hehe:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking about doing away with all sidebars in favor of a chunky, triple thickened, ultra cool footer bar&#8230;hehe:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bush Mackel</title>
		<link>http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/comment-page-1/#comment-2192</link>
		<dc:creator>Bush Mackel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/#comment-2192</guid>
		<description>@Apex - It seems that footers are all the rage now (that is footers with content) but I haven&#039;t really sat down yet and figured out what I would want in there, and what I would want (completely) in the sidebars yet. And dropdowns are something else that might be considered. Great point.

@Kyle - I meant to say, &quot;It&#039;s too bad this post didn&#039;t have a big section for SINGLE sidebars...&quot; &#039;Cause I really do think yours is ace!

And yeah, you&#039;re probably right about the &quot;situational sidebars&quot;. Maybe in a few releases of Wordpress we&#039;ll start seeing it built in. (#):) (Remember, you heard it here first!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Apex &#8211; It seems that footers are all the rage now (that is footers with content) but I haven&#8217;t really sat down yet and figured out what I would want in there, and what I would want (completely) in the sidebars yet. And dropdowns are something else that might be considered. Great point.</p>
<p>@Kyle &#8211; I meant to say, &#8220;It&#8217;s too bad this post didn&#8217;t have a big section for SINGLE sidebars&#8230;&#8221; &#8216;Cause I really do think yours is ace!</p>
<p>And yeah, you&#8217;re probably right about the &#8220;situational sidebars&#8221;. Maybe in a few releases of WordPress we&#8217;ll start seeing it built in. (#):) (Remember, you heard it here first!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Eslick</title>
		<link>http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/comment-page-1/#comment-2191</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Eslick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/#comment-2191</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;@Kyle - It’s too bad this post didn’t have a big section for sidebars, ’cause I think I’d have to give your site the big ol’ A+. But I mean seriously, your site is just looking fantastic through and through. *nod*&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thank you very much Bush!  Though I can&#039;t take credit, as many others have done something similar before me.

I think before to long you will see a majority of blogs and blog themes doing something along those lines. Blog sidebars are full of a lot of situational stuff which needs to be there for certain readers who will look for it, but doesn&#039;t need to be there for others.

Great discussion here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>@Kyle &#8211; It’s too bad this post didn’t have a big section for sidebars, ’cause I think I’d have to give your site the big ol’ A+. But I mean seriously, your site is just looking fantastic through and through. *nod*</p></blockquote>
<p>Thank you very much Bush!  Though I can&#8217;t take credit, as many others have done something similar before me.</p>
<p>I think before to long you will see a majority of blogs and blog themes doing something along those lines. Blog sidebars are full of a lot of situational stuff which needs to be there for certain readers who will look for it, but doesn&#8217;t need to be there for others.</p>
<p>Great discussion here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apexad</title>
		<link>http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/comment-page-1/#comment-2190</link>
		<dc:creator>apexad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 08:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/#comment-2190</guid>
		<description>I am not a big fan of double column sidebars.  However, if you have to do it, definitley put them on the same side.

Otherwise, I agree with Kyle and others that some stuff can be above the footer.
Also, you could reduce the size of your sidebar by doing things like making archives into a dropdown, like my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a big fan of double column sidebars.  However, if you have to do it, definitley put them on the same side.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I agree with Kyle and others that some stuff can be above the footer.<br />
Also, you could reduce the size of your sidebar by doing things like making archives into a dropdown, like my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bush Mackel</title>
		<link>http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/comment-page-1/#comment-2189</link>
		<dc:creator>Bush Mackel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 02:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/#comment-2189</guid>
		<description>@Kyle - It&#039;s too bad this post didn&#039;t have a big section for sidebars, &#039;cause I think I&#039;d have to give your site the big ol&#039; A+. But I mean seriously, your site is just looking fantastic through and through. *nod*

@Mark - Yeah, I&#039;m gonna do it. I just need a free hour or two to play with the css to knock it out. My new &quot;a little bit at a time all the time&quot; work ethic seems to be paying its dividends &#039;round here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kyle &#8211; It&#8217;s too bad this post didn&#8217;t have a big section for sidebars, &#8217;cause I think I&#8217;d have to give your site the big ol&#8217; A+. But I mean seriously, your site is just looking fantastic through and through. *nod*</p>
<p>@Mark &#8211; Yeah, I&#8217;m gonna do it. I just need a free hour or two to play with the css to knock it out. My new &#8220;a little bit at a time all the time&#8221; work ethic seems to be paying its dividends &#8217;round here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/comment-page-1/#comment-2188</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 02:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/#comment-2188</guid>
		<description>Make the leap to double bars my friend. You&#039;ll be glad you did. I have to agree with you that Baron&#039;s sidebar has always looked clean and held to a high standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make the leap to double bars my friend. You&#8217;ll be glad you did. I have to agree with you that Baron&#8217;s sidebar has always looked clean and held to a high standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Eslick</title>
		<link>http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/comment-page-1/#comment-2179</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Eslick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/#comment-2179</guid>
		<description>I definitely prefer a single sidebar.  You can always move random stuff/widgets to the footer if you need to, or wrap them up into tabs like several blogs are doing now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely prefer a single sidebar.  You can always move random stuff/widgets to the footer if you need to, or wrap them up into tabs like several blogs are doing now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bush Mackel</title>
		<link>http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/comment-page-1/#comment-2180</link>
		<dc:creator>Bush Mackel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/#comment-2180</guid>
		<description>@Grace - Hey, well I guess we all need a good break every now and then. Personally, I tend to take smaller breaks because if I were to go for too long w/o blogging I would get back all discombobelated(sp). Ha ha (#):)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Grace &#8211; Hey, well I guess we all need a good break every now and then. Personally, I tend to take smaller breaks because if I were to go for too long w/o blogging I would get back all discombobelated(sp). Ha ha (#):)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grace</title>
		<link>http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/comment-page-1/#comment-2181</link>
		<dc:creator>Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushmackel.com/2008/01/03/double-column-vs-single-column-sidebars/#comment-2181</guid>
		<description>Bush- 3 months of no blogging has got me into the blogging mood again. :D I just felt like I should stop blogging for a while and work on something else. :P But now I&#039;m back. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush- 3 months of no blogging has got me into the blogging mood again. <img src='http://www.bushmackel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  I just felt like I should stop blogging for a while and work on something else. <img src='http://www.bushmackel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  But now I&#8217;m back. <img src='http://www.bushmackel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
